In order to reduce their dependence on inputs, farmers would like to build more resilient cropping systems based on innovative agroecological practices. This would enable a reduction in pesticide use and soil tillage. They face several barriers: 1. The lack of knowledge adapted to the local context. This is often made worse by unvalidated theories and discussions found on social media networks; 2. The technical and agronomical complexity of challenges, as well as social and financial risks linked to the implementation of systemic innovations at the farm level; 3. The difficulty of assessing the long-term impacts of the new system of practices on soil, crops and sustainability; 4. Time and perseverance are necessary to achieve a new profitable systemic equilibrium despite the setbacks and failures encountered.
Solution
Setting up a participative research group including scientists (social and agronomical), advisors (experts) and a cluster of farmers sharing the same vision (or targets). In our case: "how to reduce pesticide use and tillage intensity”. Through a collaborative agreement, every actor of the group is engaged for a minimum of 3 years to progress towards the “common vision”: “an agriculture without pesticides or soil tillage”. Each farmer provides the group with a long-term 1 ha agroecological experimental field (EP1) chosen from within a larger field (CP). The two fields support the same crop each year, with the difference between the fields being that the practices implemented in the EP aim to reach a common vision. A subgroup composed of the farmer, agronomist and advisor takes technical decisions via consensus. In return, the financial risk is distributed 50/50 between the farmer and the research institution. The scientific institution monitors the crop (seedling emergence, pest and disease occurrence, biomass production, yield) and soil (chemical, structural and biological fertility) parameters in both EP and CP fields. Different forms of group meetings are regularly organised to share and discuss the results gathered on each farm, share actors’ know-how, co-design solutions and explore original external experiences.
Description
This participatory research design that mixes scientific knowledge with actors’ points of view allows for these groups to deal with a complex systemic transition where there is often a shared long-term vision but the concrete form it will take remains largely unknown. It avoids the reproduction of errors, reduces the social, technical and financial risks inherent to change and combines the acquisition of social, technical and scientific knowledge into a coherent corpus while fostering the adoption and propagation of innovation.
In order to use the comment function, you must register with the third-party provider "Disqus".
When you activate this function, your browser establishes a direct connection with the servers of the third-party provider. We would like to point out that data is transmitted to the third-party provider after activation, and the latter may set cookies that can also be used for analysis and marketing purposes. For more information, please refer to our privacy policy.
Disqus
In order to use the comment function, you must register with the third-party provider "Disqus".
When you activate this function, your browser establishes a direct connection with the servers of the third-party provider. We would like to point out that data is transmitted to the third-party provider after activation, and the latter may set cookies that can also be used for analysis and marketing purposes. For more information, please refer to our privacy policy.
Activate