Brewer’s yeast for organic pigs

Problem

Protein supply is a constant challenge for organic farming. Organic raw materials with high protein content are quite scarce in some regions. The search for alternative sources of protein leads to the evaluation of the organic industry by-products.

Solution

Brewer’s yeast is a by-product of beer in brewing industries. It is considered a liquid by-product (figure 1) with approximately 15% dry matter (DM). It is obtained from the anaerobic fermentation of beer, formed, among other ingredients, by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Brewer’s yeast has a high content of protein and vitamins of the B complex, which compensates the high transport costs due to its high water content.

Benefits

  • Yeast has a high content of protein (> 47% DM) of high biological (3.6% of lysine) and digestible value (> 85%), thus reducing the cost of feed.
  • Yeast is rich in B vitamins, especially biotin and folic acid (besides vitamin B1, B2, B6, B12, PP, B5) and in vitamin D, with a content of 2000 - 5000 IU (International Unit)/g DM.
  • The content of phosphorus in the yeast is up to 0.8-1.3%.
  • Yeast promotes animal performance and health.
  • Yeast improves the quality of the carcass.

Applicability box

Geographical coverage
Farms close to an organic brewery.

Application time
All year, although it is more available in spring and summer.

Required time
None; but no more than two days of storage.

Period of impact
None.

Equipment
Special equipment is needed, including an automat-ic system for liquid feeding and two storage tanks (figure 2) so that they can be cleaned between batches.

Best in
Sows, growers and fattening pigs.

Practical Recommendations

  • Two holding tanks are needed for hygiene reasons.
  • Yeast deteriorates very easily, do not use the product stored over 2 days.
  • It is necessary to deactivate (kill) the yeast before transporting and using it on the farm. Hence, autolyzed yeast should be used.
  • Yeast is a quite seasonal product, and it cannot be stored; however, it can be added to silage mixtures as an alternative to avoid its deterioration.

Further information

Video
Reading
Weblinks

About this practice abstract and OK-Net EcoFeed

Publishers:Asociación Valor Ecológico – Ecovalia, ES41013Sevilla,
Phone , , www.ecovalia.org
Universidad de Córdoba, Campus Universitario de Rabanales, Departa-mento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, ES14071Córdoba,
Phone , , www.uco.es
Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), CH5070Frick,
Phone +41 62 865 72 72, , www.fibl.org
IFOAM Organics Europe, BE1000Brussels,
Phone +32 2 280 12 23, , www.organicseurope.bio

Authors: Vicente Rodríguez-Estévez, Carolina Reyes-Palomo, Santos Sanz-Sanz-Fernández. Cipriano Díaz-Gaona, Cátedra de Ganadería Ecológica Ecova-lia, Universidad de Córdoba, Spain

Review: Lindsay Whistance, Organic Research Centre, UK, Lauren Dietemann, FiBL Switzerland, Helga Willer, FiBL Switzerland

Contact: vrestevez@uco.es

OK-Net EcoFeed:

https://orgprints.org/view/projects/OKNetEcoFeed.html

This practice abstract was elaborated in the Organic Knowledge Network on Monogastric Animal Feed project. The project is running from January 2018 to December 2020. The overall aim of OKNet EcoFeed is to help farmers, breeders and the organic feed processing industry in achieving the goal of 100% use of organic and regional feed for monogastrics.

Project website: https://ok-net-ecofeed.eu/

Project partners:

IFOAM Organics Europe (project coordinator), BE; Aarhus University (ICROFS), DK; Organic Research Centre (ORC), UK; Institut Technique de l'Agriculture Biologique (ITAB), FR; Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), CH; Bioland, DE; Associazione Italiana perl'Agricoltura Biologica (AIAB), IT; Donau Soja DS, AT; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE; ECOVALIA, ES; Soil Association, UK.

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 773911. This communication only reflects the author’s view. The Research Executive Agency is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information provided. The authors and editors do not assume responsibility or liability for any possible factual inaccuracies or damage resulting from the application of the recommendations in this practice abstract

Survey
Practice Abstract
https://organic-farmknowledge.org/practice-abstract?tx_farmknowledgeabstracts_abstracts%5Babstracts%5D=49&tx_farmknowledgeabstracts_abstracts%5Baction%5D=show&tx_farmknowledgeabstracts_abstracts%5Bcontroller%5D=Abstracts&cHash=cd307a3af62a5bb980bbf8f1c31018e9